I've been running Arch Linux on my personal and work laptops for a couple of years and love it: it's very configurable, cutting edge, (surprisingly) stable and has awesome documentation (useful for all Linux users).
However, there's one aspect of it that really bugs me: files related to the current kernel and kernel modules (inc. device drivers) are aggressively purged as soon as you upgrade the linux kernel package i.e. the kernel modules built against the running kernel are no longer on disk so cannot be dynamically loaded. This issue has a variety of effects.
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT nvme0n1 259:0 0 953.9G 0 disk ├─nvme0n1p1 259:1 0 512M 0 part /boot └─nvme0n1p3 259:2 0 953.1G 0 part └─luks 254:0 0 953.1G 0 crypt ├─vg0-swap 254:1 0 48G 0 lvm [SWAP] ├─vg0-root 254:2 0 200G 0 lvm / └─vg0-home 254:3 0 690G 0 lvm /home
Nope. However, running lsusb showed that the device was visible on the USB bus:
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04f3:21d5 Elan Microelectronics Corp. Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0cf3:e300 Qualcomm Atheros Communications Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0c45:6713 Microdia Bus 001 Device 019: ID 058f:1234 Alcor Micro Corp. Flash Drive Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Yep: Alcor Micro Corp. Flash Drive was my USB stick.
It turned out that no block device had been created as the relevant kernel driver couldn't be found: I'd upgraded the kernel OS package since booting the machine and all old kernel files inc. kernel modules had been deleted.
If you find that you can't mount a USB stick, mount a CIFS share or have some other reason to believe that some device driver is unavailable then check that:
(the release of the currently running kernel) is equal to
pacman -Q linux
which is the version of the current
linux OS package (kernel files and kernel module files on disk). If not, you'll need to reboot to load the newer kernel.
Take-home message: If pacman (the Arch package management utility) tells you that you need to upgrade your kernel, reboot ASAP afterwards. One of several reasons why Arch Linux would make for a very poor choice on a server host OS, despite being an awesome desktop OS!
Note that other Linux OSs are more conservative when it comes to keeping older kernels around: Debian, for example, keeps many older kernels on disk post-upgrade, which has its own issues (boot partitions getting full being the main one).
However, that approach does allow you to continue using all stuff built against the current kernel until you reboot plus gives you fallback options if you encounter problems with a new kernel. The Arch devs assume that you'll never want to revert to an older kernel. Saying that, that's yet to be a problem for me on my laptops!
Thanks to Namarrgon in #archlinux on Freenode IRC for pointing me at the root cause of this issue!